Expelling Creationism from…Conservatism?
April 25th, 2008 RWA Posted in News | 4 Comments »
I was looking forward to reading John Derbyshire’s review EXPELLED for National Review. He’s already taken down the trailer and misleading web campaign superbly (read here for direct links and commentary by DCers), but alas, NR decided instead to give priority to two doofuses, David Klinghoffer and Dave Berg (I’m not going to link directly to them and make you waste your time; instead, read The Sensuous Curmudgeon’s witty take on them). Fortunately, both Derb and Jonah Goldberg (more reservedly) let it be known that they don’t share Klinghoffer or Berg’s views…but then Goldberg decided to share some real, real, REAL stupid mail he had gotten from people who do agree with them. In fit of pique, I wrote back, and Goldberg was kind enough to print my reply (I’m the third response down), but he did chastize me gently for “beating up” on his other correspondants.
OK, so maybe I was a little too brutal, and I do cringe a little at my attempts at sarcasm, although it’s hard to react otherwise when confronted with people stupider than Kim Kardashian after inhaling the fumes at a Magic Marker factory. I guess you could forgive me for feeling PeeZeeish that day by the fact that infuriates me that even a mainstream publication like NR will let pseudoscientific kooks use it as a platform. The next issue of NR even features a review of David Berlinski’s latest book by George Gilder-WHEN WILL THEY LEARN??? If NR really wants to keep William F. Buckley’s memory alive, then they should work at expelling the Discovery Institute and creationism from conservatism, the same way WFB shunted the John Birch Society and the conspiracy kooks to the margins. It’s unfortunate that an “enemy of my enemy is my friend” mentality runs through the mainstreams of both the right and left, leading both of them to embrace ignorant or fringe beliefs and individuals simply because they regard them as an ally against ideological opponents. This leads the left to reprehensibly defend their dalliances with obvious slimeballs like Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Hugo Chavez and their immoral ilk, and leads the right to equally scuzzy defenses of creationists. That’s the only reason I can fathom that Goldberg, who believes in evolution and not in creationism, would let the antievos speak through his publication, even when he knows they’re wrong. It is also the only explanation I give for Ed Morrissey’s bizarre review of EXPELLED. Ed admits that evolution is correct, he admits it doesn’t interfere with his faith, he admits that ID is just a way for creationists to try to shove religion in where it doesn’t belong, and he admits that the Darwin-Hitler link is tenuous at best, but all that pales to him in comparison to the fight to “win the culture wars” and secure academic freedom. And on those grounds alone, he praises EXPELLED for trying to argue in favor of “freedom of scientific inquiry”. Tell you what, Ed. Ask your son, the physics Ph.D candidate what the real “battle for freedom of scientific inquiry” is all about. Here’s a hint: it’s not the scientists who are eating their own.
All of this gets under my skin. It gets underneath the skin of all of us founding Darwin Central members, and is the whole raison d’etre for our being here. We love our country, our values, and our system of free enterprise, but we also love science, and history shows that any society or movement which takes an adversarial stance towards science winds up crumbling, and we’re determined not to let that happen to either America or conservatism. And fortunately, we aren’t the only conservatives who feel that way. John Farrell, Rand Simberg and best of all, Dafydd ab Hugh have all flunked EXPELLED for being both bad science and bad politics, with Dafydd offering an especially witty, well-organized and LONG takedown. Even Little Green Footballs is hawking EXPELLED EXPOSED! I don’t advise opening the comments if you’re using Vista because it’ll crash your browser, but let’s just say that Chris Hitchens has some friends there. It does give one pause to think that much of the conservative and Republican base is waking up to the dangers of the New Creationism, but too many people who should know better are still in a long slumber.
April 28th, 2008 at 11:26 am
[...] by National Review’s resident evolution aficiondo John Derbyshire, and while NR itself may have disappointed me, the Derb sure didn’t. He has a great takedown in today’s National Review Online, [...]
May 9th, 2008 at 3:13 am
It’s take for you to wake up. If you believe the slander that Little Green Footballs is composed of “loony nuke-Mecca types” then you have another thing coming. LGF is among the strongest defenders of Darwinism on the Web today — along with many other “neo-con” sites whose nature you apparently misapprehend in the extreme. And any troll on LGF who advocates nuking anything, even once, is immediately banned. Once the neo-conservative movement publicly breaks any connection with the creationists (and it will happen soon), millions of Americans will defect from the neo-Marxism of the Democratic Party to the secular pro-freedom patriotism of the “new right” or whatever this as-yet unnamed movement/orientation will be called.
Better start looking into what places like LGF really believe in and stand for, because soon enough you will be on their team. You mind find yourself pleasantly amazed.
May 10th, 2008 at 9:05 pm
individual: lgf and me are on the same wavelength on the majority of issues, and Charles Johnson is an excellent fact-finder, but too many of the respondents go way, way too far, and the rapid pace and busy trafficing of the site means that a lot of the more extreme reader responses wind up sticking around for far longer than intended. Still, I share your hopes for a new secular right becoming more vocal, and in the spirit of civility and trucedom, I’ve edited the post to remove some my more vitriolic comments; I made a mistake and I thank you for pointing it out. I’ll try to reign in the sarcasm, or at least be gentler in the future. Thank you for your input.
May 11th, 2008 at 1:49 pm
RWA: Thanks for editing the post. Because of one or two commenters many years ago (who have been long ago banned), LGF got smeared by the left with this hard-to-shake reputation of being the “nuke everything” site, which is as far from the truth as can be. 99% of the commenters (including the proprietor) don’t think that way, and it is generally suspected that those few people who do on rare occasion suggest nuking something are themselves “moby”s simply trying to discredit LGF. The vast majority of LGF commenters also accept evolution and reject creationism (to the extent that they care about the topic at all). And that includes Charles Johnson. Yes, there is a vocal minority of creationists who pop up here and there, but people generally aren’t banned or deleted from LGF for expressing differing opinions — only when they get abusive or advocate violence. You can imagine the task that presents itself to Charles Johnson every single day, during which he has to somehow monitor several hundred comments being made every hour — an impossible job. He tries to keep on top of it but with a blog that popular, sometimes unpleasant comments stick around for a hour or two before they can be deleted. But that’s generally not the tenor of the site.