<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Republican visits a creation museum&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.darwincentral.org/2009/03/23/a-republican-visits-a-creation-museum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.darwincentral.org/2009/03/23/a-republican-visits-a-creation-museum/</link>
	<description>Coniuratio compatiens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 04:02:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RWA</title>
		<link>http://blog.darwincentral.org/2009/03/23/a-republican-visits-a-creation-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-27880</link>
		<dc:creator>RWA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.darwincentral.org/?p=346#comment-27880</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I&#039;m very familiar with Brian Boyd&#039;s work in evolutionary approaches to rhetoric and composition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I&#8217;m very familiar with Brian Boyd&#8217;s work in evolutionary approaches to rhetoric and composition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://blog.darwincentral.org/2009/03/23/a-republican-visits-a-creation-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-27877</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.darwincentral.org/?p=346#comment-27877</guid>
		<description>There is an article in the print edition of the current American Scholar (http://www.theamericanscholar.org/), a publication aimed mainly at academia, on the notion of Darwinian thought robbing life of &quot;meaning&quot; - it rejects the notion but doesn&#039;t really respond to creationism. I guess I don&#039;t get it when people find their &quot;truth&quot; diminished by &quot;facts.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an article in the print edition of the current American Scholar (<a href="http://www.theamericanscholar.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theamericanscholar.org/</a>), a publication aimed mainly at academia, on the notion of Darwinian thought robbing life of &#8220;meaning&#8221; &#8211; it rejects the notion but doesn&#8217;t really respond to creationism. I guess I don&#8217;t get it when people find their &#8220;truth&#8221; diminished by &#8220;facts.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
