The Malthus Falcon (Chapter 1)

June 28th, 2006 Jemmy Button

IT WAS AN HOUR before lunch, but I didn’t have a client and there was nowhere to look for one. So I put my feet on my desk, pulled a bottle out of the bottom drawer and poured a slug of bourbon into my coffee cup. From the window, the Golden Gate was half-hidden in the dirty fog, the thin sunlight falling on my desk was sliced to ribbons by the Venetian blinds. I lit up a Camel, watched the smoke rise languidly until it hit the ceiling fan, then started to study the racing form. I was thinking about placing a punt on a filly in the 12:40 Santa Anita Handicap when the door opened.

She was blonde and slim and her legs held my eyes like two long strips of flypaper curling out from a little black cocktail dress they’d ban in Boston. This was a doll with the kind of looks to give you the KO punch in the first round.
Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Commentary | 2 Comments »

A Look at Creation “Science” — Part I

June 22nd, 2006 Bones

THIS IS THE FIRST OF A CONTINUING SERIES examining what is being passed off as science on creationist websites.

The following are the concluding paragraphs from an article titled The non-transitions in ‘human evolution’–on evolutionists’ terms, by John Woodmorappe. This article is posted on the answersingenesis.org website.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Commentary | 6 Comments »

Take your beating like an Ann…

June 14th, 2006 Black Ops

IN CASE YOU THOUGHT we were being unusually cruel or unkind in our mocking of Coulter’s latest excreta, confirmation of our take comes from the inimitable Right Wing Professor, in his review of Godless:

One of the curious things about book reviewing is that it’s harder to review a bad book than a good one, and Ann Coulter’s Godless is a really bad book. It shows all the signs of having been hastily written, it’s poorly researched, tendentious, and full of falsehoods, half-truths and distortions.

And those are the parts he liked.

Posted in Commentary, Reviews | No Comments »

InANNities, Part II

June 14th, 2006 Black Ops

THE EVOLUTIONISTS’ PROOF is their capacity to concoct a story. They say the whale “evolved” when a bear fell into the ocean. The bat “evolved” when squirrels developed flaps that helped them leap longer distances and fall to the ground more slowly. This isn’t a joke.

– Godless, pp. 228-229

Oh, it’s a joke alright. Unfortunately, the joke’s on Ann.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Commentary, Reviews | 11 Comments »

InANNities, Part I

June 13th, 2006 Black Ops

THERE IS NO REASON TO EXPECT, for example, that the first place our eyes ever appeared was on the front of our faces. Why don’t we have ancestors with eyes on the bottom of their feet, on their arms, or on top of their heads? Eyes might be best positioned in the front of our heads, but eyes on the bottom of our feet are better than no eyes all, and so should have stuck around at least for a while in the fossil record. But they’re not there.

– Godless, p. 218

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Commentary, Reviews | 28 Comments »

Never Let the Facts Get in the Way of a Good Story

June 6th, 2006 Black Ops

WELL, HERE IT IS, the sixth of June already, and that means a couple of things to us here at Darwin Central. We’re a few short weeks from the official beginning of summer. Some awful movie is opening today, taking full advantage of the 6/6/06 hype. Oh yeah, and an equally awful book is being released today. Awful for different reasons than the movie, to be sure, but awful nonetheless.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Commentary, Reviews | 2 Comments »

Pied Pipers At The Gates Of Dawn

June 2nd, 2006 midwifetoad

MIDWIFE TOAD HAS BEEN A BUSY LITTLE HOPPER. Afflicted with terminal ADD, he has been indulging his latest whim, which is none other that finding the world’s worst web site. This is a tall order, considering the candidates include such paragons as The Time Cube. But the criterion for worst must sink beneath sublime derangement. Toad favors amnesty for undocumented intellectuals. To qualify as the worst, a site must be positively harmful.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Commentary | 10 Comments »

Well, WE knew what it meant

June 2nd, 2006 Black Ops

“INDIAN COWBOY”, that is. If you’re not a blinkered leftist, it’s pretty easy to figure out that what at first blush might appear to be a contradiction really isnt. Anyway, the idea that someone who supports good science doesn’t have to also be a flaming leftist (we don’t like the term “liberal”, since they’re usually anything but), is likely enough to toss certain quarters into a bit of a tizzy.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Commentary | 2 Comments »

God said it … or did He?

May 22nd, 2006 Central Archivist

CHURCHES IN THE SOUTH have a tradition of putting pithy, inspirational, or otherwise relevant sayings on their marquees in an effort to attract notice, and hopefully new members and visitors. A church about three-quarters of a mile from my house has sported a two-liner for the past couple of weeks: “God said it. I believe it.”

The first thing that crossed my mind when I saw this was, “but did God actually say it?”

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Commentary | No Comments »

Limbaugh’s Comments Make Monkey of Conservatism

May 19th, 2006 Central Archivist

RUSH LIMBAUGH IS ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT when it comes to skewering the left and has a grasp of political reality that is second to none. His innate talent in this regard has catapulted him to being the de facto spokesperson for the conservative movement in this country.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Commentary | 3 Comments »