<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Darwin Central</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.darwincentral.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.darwincentral.org</link>
	<description>Coniuratio compatiens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 04:02:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chicago Reacts to the Supreme Court &#8230; Chicago Style by pagan</title>
		<link>http://blog.darwincentral.org/2010/07/02/chicago-reacts-to-the-supreme-court-chicago-style/comment-page-1/#comment-32168</link>
		<dc:creator>pagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 04:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.darwincentral.org/?p=839#comment-32168</guid>
		<description>I remember the previous Daley; vote early, vote often, bring out your dead (Holy Grail?) to vote and vote as I say or my fellow thugs will beat you with Cubs baseball bats 
and pipes...and probably pistol whip you with our contraband machine guns.    I am Mayor Daley, armed and I and my contingent of armed thugs...umm body guards and Aldermen are here to make my corrupt administration safe...from the people.     Nothing changes, sheep continue to install our enemies into office?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember the previous Daley; vote early, vote often, bring out your dead (Holy Grail?) to vote and vote as I say or my fellow thugs will beat you with Cubs baseball bats<br />
and pipes&#8230;and probably pistol whip you with our contraband machine guns.    I am Mayor Daley, armed and I and my contingent of armed thugs&#8230;umm body guards and Aldermen are here to make my corrupt administration safe&#8230;from the people.     Nothing changes, sheep continue to install our enemies into office?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hollywood to Help Clean-Up Effort in Gulf by Gumlegs</title>
		<link>http://blog.darwincentral.org/2010/06/02/hollywood-to-help-clean-up-effort-in-gulf/comment-page-1/#comment-32152</link>
		<dc:creator>Gumlegs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.darwincentral.org/?p=814#comment-32152</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s always the dead guy ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always the dead guy &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hollywood to Help Clean-Up Effort in Gulf by satchmodog</title>
		<link>http://blog.darwincentral.org/2010/06/02/hollywood-to-help-clean-up-effort-in-gulf/comment-page-1/#comment-32143</link>
		<dc:creator>satchmodog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 04:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.darwincentral.org/?p=814#comment-32143</guid>
		<description>Only De Mille could do this whole thing the right way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only De Mille could do this whole thing the right way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on US Supports Muslim Demands for Anti-Blasphemy Laws by Gumlegs</title>
		<link>http://blog.darwincentral.org/2009/10/21/us-supports-muslim-demands-for-anti-blasphemy-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-32104</link>
		<dc:creator>Gumlegs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.darwincentral.org/?p=464#comment-32104</guid>
		<description>It would appear my fears are shared by others.  Stuart Taylor writes, &quot;It was nice to hear Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton say on October 26, &quot;I strongly disagree&quot; with Islamic countries seeking to censor free speech worldwide by making defamation of religion a crime under international law.

&quot;But watch what the Obama administration does, not just what it says. I&#039;m not talking about its attacks on Fox News. I&#039;m talking about a little-publicized October 2 resolution in which Clinton&#039;s own State Department joined Islamic nations in adopting language all-too-friendly to censoring speech that some religions and races find offensive.&quot;

From here: http://www.nationaljournal.com/njmagazine/openingargument.php

It&#039;s also discussed at The Volokh Conspiracy, http://volokh.com/2009/10/30/stuart-taylor-on-obama-administrations-endorsement-of-restricting-advocacy-of-religious-hatred-that-constitutes-incitement-to-hostility/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would appear my fears are shared by others.  Stuart Taylor writes, &#8220;It was nice to hear Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton say on October 26, &#8220;I strongly disagree&#8221; with Islamic countries seeking to censor free speech worldwide by making defamation of religion a crime under international law.</p>
<p>&#8220;But watch what the Obama administration does, not just what it says. I&#8217;m not talking about its attacks on Fox News. I&#8217;m talking about a little-publicized October 2 resolution in which Clinton&#8217;s own State Department joined Islamic nations in adopting language all-too-friendly to censoring speech that some religions and races find offensive.&#8221;</p>
<p>From here: <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/njmagazine/openingargument.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationaljournal.com/njmagazine/openingargument.php</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s also discussed at The Volokh Conspiracy, <a href="http://volokh.com/2009/10/30/stuart-taylor-on-obama-administrations-endorsement-of-restricting-advocacy-of-religious-hatred-that-constitutes-incitement-to-hostility/" rel="nofollow">http://volokh.com/2009/10/30/stuart-taylor-on-obama-administrations-endorsement-of-restricting-advocacy-of-religious-hatred-that-constitutes-incitement-to-hostility/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on US Supports Muslim Demands for Anti-Blasphemy Laws by Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.darwincentral.org/2009/10/21/us-supports-muslim-demands-for-anti-blasphemy-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-32091</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.darwincentral.org/?p=464#comment-32091</guid>
		<description>Yeah, me too.  I would like to believe that the Obama administration is capable of admitting a mistake (if that&#039;s what it was) and changing its mind/stance/policy.

Time will tell, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, me too.  I would like to believe that the Obama administration is capable of admitting a mistake (if that&#8217;s what it was) and changing its mind/stance/policy.</p>
<p>Time will tell, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on US Supports Muslim Demands for Anti-Blasphemy Laws by Gumlegs</title>
		<link>http://blog.darwincentral.org/2009/10/21/us-supports-muslim-demands-for-anti-blasphemy-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-32085</link>
		<dc:creator>Gumlegs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.darwincentral.org/?p=464#comment-32085</guid>
		<description>Update:  Could this be a possbile source of the variation in reporting:

&quot;(CNSNews.com) – Seeking to break a longstanding impasse between Western and Islamic nations over freedom of expression, the United States has piloted a finely-balanced resolution through the U.N.’s Human Rights Council which the two sides are choosing to interpret differently.&quot;

From: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/54982

I am hoping that your report, which is much more current than any of the ones I have, including the one above, represents a change in direction, and not a reflection of the differences in &quot;interpretation.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update:  Could this be a possbile source of the variation in reporting:</p>
<p>&#8220;(CNSNews.com) – Seeking to break a longstanding impasse between Western and Islamic nations over freedom of expression, the United States has piloted a finely-balanced resolution through the U.N.’s Human Rights Council which the two sides are choosing to interpret differently.&#8221;</p>
<p>From: <a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/54982" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/54982</a></p>
<p>I am hoping that your report, which is much more current than any of the ones I have, including the one above, represents a change in direction, and not a reflection of the differences in &#8220;interpretation.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on US Supports Muslim Demands for Anti-Blasphemy Laws by Gumlegs</title>
		<link>http://blog.darwincentral.org/2009/10/21/us-supports-muslim-demands-for-anti-blasphemy-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-32084</link>
		<dc:creator>Gumlegs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.darwincentral.org/?p=464#comment-32084</guid>
		<description>It certainly does, Mike.  I shall look into this further.  It could be that whoever represents the US at the UN body in question isn&#039;t on the same page as the Secretary of State.  It wouldn&#039;t be the first time.  It could also be that we&#039;ve reversed course, which would be a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly does, Mike.  I shall look into this further.  It could be that whoever represents the US at the UN body in question isn&#8217;t on the same page as the Secretary of State.  It wouldn&#8217;t be the first time.  It could also be that we&#8217;ve reversed course, which would be a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on US Supports Muslim Demands for Anti-Blasphemy Laws by Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.darwincentral.org/2009/10/21/us-supports-muslim-demands-for-anti-blasphemy-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-32081</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.darwincentral.org/?p=464#comment-32081</guid>
		<description>This from the AP seems to contradict the article above:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33486054/ns/world_news-world_faith/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This from the AP seems to contradict the article above:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33486054/ns/world_news-world_faith/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33486054/ns/world_news-world_faith/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uncloseting the Discovery Institute: The IDea that Dare Not Speak Its Name (Part 1) by Mitchell Kent</title>
		<link>http://blog.darwincentral.org/2007/10/17/uncloseting-the-discovery-institute-the-idea-that-dare-not-speak-its-name-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-32020</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.darwincentral.org/2007/10/17/uncloseting-the-discovery-institute-the-idea-that-dare-not-speak-its-name-part-1/#comment-32020</guid>
		<description>Please be reminded of the Dover Pa, ruling on Di where a conservative Bush appointed Federal Judge called the DI people dishonest and guilt of perjury. He also ruled that ID is a religious belief and had no part of Science education.  PBS has a documentary on the trial that is worth watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please be reminded of the Dover Pa, ruling on Di where a conservative Bush appointed Federal Judge called the DI people dishonest and guilt of perjury. He also ruled that ID is a religious belief and had no part of Science education.  PBS has a documentary on the trial that is worth watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Limbaugh&#8217;s Rush to Laud &#8220;Expelled&#8221; Reveals Ignorance by Brights Marburg &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Darwin-Spielfilm kontrovers zur US-Bigotterie</title>
		<link>http://blog.darwincentral.org/2008/03/19/limbaughs-rush-to-laud-expelled-reveals-ignorance/comment-page-1/#comment-31976</link>
		<dc:creator>Brights Marburg &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Darwin-Spielfilm kontrovers zur US-Bigotterie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.darwincentral.org/2008/03/19/limbaughs-rush-to-laud-expelled-reveals-ignorance/#comment-31976</guid>
		<description>[...] racist, a bigot and an 1800s naturalist whose legacy is mass murder&#8221;. Die Grenzen zwischen Feinbild-Bekämpfung, mangelhafter Bildung und der Neigung zur Volksverhetzung sind in Kreisen der [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] racist, a bigot and an 1800s naturalist whose legacy is mass murder&#8221;. Die Grenzen zwischen Feinbild-Bekämpfung, mangelhafter Bildung und der Neigung zur Volksverhetzung sind in Kreisen der [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
